Cited by 382Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SPATIAL PATTERNS AND CONTROLS ON HISTORICAL FIRE REGIMES AND FOREST STRUCTURE IN THE KLAMATH MOUNTAINS

Taylor, Alan H., Skinner, Carl N.·2003·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Fire exclusion in mixed conifer forests has increased the risk of fire due to decades of fuel accumulation. Restoration of fire into altered forests is a challenge because of a poor understanding of the spatial and temporal dynamics of fire regimes. In this study the spatial and temporal characteristics of fire regimes and forest age structure are reconstructed in a 2325-ha mixed conifer forest in the Klamath Mountains. Forests were multiaged and burned frequently at low and moderate severity, but forest age structure did not vary with aspect, elevation, or topographic position. Recently there has been an increase in forest density and a forest compositional shift to shade-tolerant species. Median fire return intervals (FRI) ranged from 11.5 to 16.5 yr and varied with aspect but not with forest composition or elevation. The median area burned was 106 ha, and the pre-Euro-American fire rotation of 19 yr increased to 238 yr after 1905. Intra-annual position of fire scars in the tree rings indicates that 93% of fires occurred during the dry midsummer through fall period. Spatial patterns of sites with similar fire dates were spatially coherent and separated from others by topographic features that influence fire spread. Thus, patterns of fire occurrence tended to be fixed in space with timing of fires varying among groups of sites. Spatial and temporal patterns of fire occurrence suggest that managers using physical features to contain prescribed fire will create burn patterns consistent with historical fires in the Klamath Mountains. Corresponding Editor: B. J. Bond

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0704:spacoh]2.0.co;2

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1023/A:1008181313360 · DOI
  2. 10.1139/cjfr-29-2-202 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, A. H., & Skinner, C. N.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Alan H.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
704-719
ISSN
1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110220659
Cited by
377
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
fire regimes, fire return interval, fire scars, fire history, mixed conifer forest, fire suppression, forest age structure, prescribed burning, fire rotation, fire seasonality, forest restoration, Klamath Mountains, fuel accumulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review